Sunday, February 7, 2016

Different types of the engine’s Air-compressor

By Ryan

When people searching at the information of different vehicles, they may find the engine types of those cars are different, some may confused by the distinction of naturally aspirated, turbocharge and supercharge. To tell the difference, of course we need to know their operating principle.
In normally aspirated piston engines, intake gases are "pushed" into the engine by atmospheric pressure filling the volumetric void caused by the downward stroke of the piston (which creates a low-pressure area), similar to drawing liquid using a syringe.
The turbocharger's compressor draws in ambient air and compresses it before it enters into the intake manifold at increased pressure. This results in a greater mass of air entering the cylinders on each intake stroke. The power needed to spin the centrifugal compressor is derived from the kinetic energy of the engine's exhaust gases. The main advantage of turbocharger is increasing fuel efficiency and increasing power at the same time. This is achieved by recovering waste energy in the exhaust and feeding it back into the engine intake. By using this otherwise wasted energy to increase the mass of air, it becomes easier to ensure that all fuel is burned before being vented at the start of the exhaust stage. The increased temperature from the higher pressure gives a higher efficiency.
In contrast to turbochargers, superchargers are mechanically driven by the engine. Belts, chains, shafts, and gears are common methods of powering a supercharger, placing a mechanical load on the engine. Compare to the turbo technology, mechanical pressurization completely solved the throttle response lag, turbo lag and power output achieve instant throttle response, linear power with rotational speed, and can increase the driving performance. In addition, in high torque at low speed, superchargers can provide instantaneous acceleration, but in another hand, this is where the principal disadvantage of a supercharger becomes apparent; the engine must withstand the net power output of the engine plus the power to drive the supercharger, so it has lower adiabatic efficiency as compared to turbochargers.
Inevitably, the primary disadvantage of turbocharging is what is referred to as "lag" or "spool time". This is the time between the demand for an increase in power (the throttle being opened) and the turbocharger(s) providing increased intake pressure. Throttle lag occurs because turbochargers rely on the buildup of exhaust gas pressure to drive the turbine. In variable output systems such as automobile engines, exhaust gas pressure at idle, low engine speeds, or low throttle is usually insufficient to drive the turbine. Only when the engine reaches sufficient speed does the turbine section start to spool up, or spin fast enough to produce intake pressure above atmospheric pressure.
VW's twincharging system


  In summary, none of them is perfect solution in rising the power but reducing the cost at the same time, the latest technology is twinturbing, which is a combination of an exhaust-driven turbocharger and an engine-driven supercharger so that the weaknesses of both can minimized. But we have reason to believe that this is not the end, the seeking of better solution will never stop.


Sources
Turbocharger - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Images

No comments:

Post a Comment